|
|
Monday, September 24th, 2007
|
11:07a - Neocons
Whenever you hear someone whine about the "rules of engagement" for our troops, you're hearing a cry for indiscriminate killing. And the people pushing for a policy of slaughter ostensibly to bring freedom to Iraq (and Iran) are, of course, the pro-war, religionist socialists we know as the neoconservatives. A neoconservative is neither neo or conservative. They are not neo, because central planning has been with us for centuries, and they're not conservative because they have nothing but disdain for freedom and free markets, prefering to turn to the federal government to "solve" problems. I say religionist and not Christian, because while they do pay lip service to some passages in the scripture, they ignore all of the defining themes of Christ's message according to the gospels: love thy neighbor as thyself and turn the other cheek.
I'm not sure where preemptive assaults on Iraq and Iran are found in the doctrine of love thy enemy and turn the other cheek, but I'm sure if Michelle Malkin and Bill O'Reilly put their heads together, they could fabricate something resembling an argument.
What the hell is wrong with people?
Ron Paul needs to win this election.
(20 comments |comment on this)
|
|
|
|
